# Payouts
Auditor payouts consist of shares of the prize pool calculated based on the [severity](https://docs.codehawks.com/hawks-auditors/how-to-evaluate-a-finding-severity) and [number of findings](https://docs.codehawks.com/hawks-auditors/how-to-write-and-submit-a-finding) an auditor submits during a smart contract auditing competition.
Here's how rewards are calculated:
High / Medium Findings
**Current Payout Calculation:**
For competitive audits, the payouts are currently determined as:
* **Medium-Risk Shares**: `1 * (0.9^(findingCount - 1)) / findingCount`
* **High-Risk Shares**: `5 * (0.9^(findingCount - 1)) / findingCount`
This calculation is subject to future adjustments to align with auditors' needs.
**Example:**
Given a **H/M Prize Pot** of **$30,000** and a **Final report** with **3 Highs** and **2 Mediums**:
* **Auditor A** submitted: High A, B, Medium A
* **Auditor B** submitted: High A, C, Medium A, B
* **Auditor C** submitted: High A, Medium A, B, C
The shares per finding would be:
* **Medium A** (3 findings): `1 * (0.9^(3 - 1)) / 3 = 0.27`
* **Medium B** (2 findings): `1 * (0.9^(2 - 1)) / 2 = 0.45`
* **Medium C** (1 finding): `1 * (0.9^(1 - 1)) / 1 = 1`
* **High A** (3 findings): `5 * (0.9^(3 - 1)) / 3 = 1.35`
* **High B** (1 finding): `5 * (0.9^(1 - 1)) / 1 = 5`
* **High C** (1 finding): `5 * (0.9^(1 - 1)) / 1 = 5`
Total shares:
* **Auditor A**: `1.35 + 5 + 0.27 = 6.62` shares
* **Auditor B**: `1.35 + 5 + 0.27 + 0.45 = 7.07` shares
* **Auditor C**: `1.35 + 0.27 + 0.45 + 1 = 3.07` shares
The prize distribution would be:
* **Auditor A**: `6.62 / 16.76 = 39.5%` of the prize pot = $11,850
* **Auditor B**: `7.07 / 16.76 = 42.2%` of the prize pot = $12,660
* **Auditor C**: `3.07 / 16.76 = 18.3%` of the prize pot = $5,490
Low Findings
For this tier, the prize pool is considerably smaller. The current calculation for low-risk shares is:
* **Low-Risk Shares**: `1 * (0.9^(findingCount - 1)) / findingCount`
Given the smaller prize pool and the potential volume of findings in this tier, auditors should note that judges may disqualify low-effort submissions at their discretion.
#### QA / Gas / Informational
As of August 18th, 2023, CodeHawks has stopped accepting findings related to gas optimizations, quality assurance issues, and informational insights.
{% hint style="warning" %}
Rewards are paid out in **USDC** through the **ZKsync chain**. Crediting the reward **won't be possible** without a ZKsync wallet connected to the user profile.
Payouts may be within 0.0001 USDC margin of error.
{% endhint %}
***
### Duplicate issues
An issue is considered a duplicate if they have the same **root cause**. For example, the following two issues are duplicates:
* **No zero address check results in loss of funds: high**
* **Users can lose precision when it doesn't check for address(0): low.**
These have the same **root cause** even though they are submitted with different severity levels and are considered duplicates.
The following are not considered duplicates:
* **Users can lose precision when it doesn't check for address(0): low.**
* **Dividing before multiplying loses precision: low.**
Since they have different root causes (checking the zero address vs dividing before multiplying), they are not considered duplicates.
---
# Agent Instructions: Querying This Documentation
If you need additional information that is not directly available in this page, you can query the documentation dynamically by asking a question.
Perform an HTTP GET request on the current page URL with the `ask` query parameter:
```
GET https://docs.codehawks.com/hawks-auditors/payouts.md?ask=
```
The question should be specific, self-contained, and written in natural language.
The response will contain a direct answer to the question and relevant excerpts and sources from the documentation.
Use this mechanism when the answer is not explicitly present in the current page, you need clarification or additional context, or you want to retrieve related documentation sections.